Thursday, April 25, 2013

Scale: Part 3 - Environmental Concerns in China


The recent development of China’s cities provides lessons for densification that is being promoted for American cities. The trick, of course, is improvement without losing the beneficial qualities of the past. Clear-cutting neighborhoods for new development loses the rich texture of a city with historic neighborhoods. Just as a tree plantation cannot replicate a forest, ecological diversity is hard to design and must be allowed to grow. Nevertheless, China’s determination to densify their cities has required and received governmental commitment to build mass-transit systems and improve roads, to upgrade water and sewer systems, and to provide electrical power. What has been lost are the bicycles and the civic scale this kind of transport supports.

Another consequence is the pollution of the air and waterways. China has rich deposits of coal, unfortunately the soft bituminous kind that burns producing more carbon dioxide pollution. A vast majority of China’s power is supplied by coal fuel, both at the local and industrial scale. Mostly unregulated, coal mining is unsafe and many injuries occur. Air quality is reported on daily weather reports on a scale from excellent to severely polluted with all fifteen major cities identified with ambiguous color coding that shows a moderately polluted to worse range, along with a website that is inaccessible outside the country. In cities the smog is constant and many wear masks almost as a fashion accessory. Many more develop a “Beijing cough” after a few days in the city, and the countryside provides little relief.
  
China's climate includes seasonal monsoons. Attempts to control coastal flooding has prompted channelizing the three primary rivers of which the Three Gorges Dam has been successful in this regard, but like all civil engineering projects, they require a commitment for maintenance. Pressure to industrialize, especially in nearby villages with cheap labor, have allowed manufacturing practices that pollute. Given lax inspections and the lack of judicial recourse, violations occur. For instance, the Shanghai Daily reported on 18 April 2013 that villagers east of Zhejiang province in Lanxi City have protested that an aluminum factory has caused excessive pollution and fluoride poisoning resulting in a cancer cluster, but the government response was that “waste discharges meet national environmental standards.”

The economic drivers that have produced the recent “modernization” have occurred on the back of the Chinese people to the detriment of the environment. John Bryan Starr in Understanding China (2010, page 214) notes that sixteen million areas of arable land has become desert due to deforestation since 1949 with more lost to converting farmland for development and its supporting infrastructure. Given the limited amount of land suitable for farming and the growing population, it is alarming to think of the ecological and social consequences of China’s recent development. One landscape architecture firm, Turenscape in Beijing, is responding with public projects that clean polluted water in un-channelized waterfront parks with plants including productive crops. The health of the Chinese people and the global impact of failing to responsibly manage natural resources will be the true evidence of progress in this ancient, fascinating and important country.

No comments:

Post a Comment